Monday, December 9, 2019

Emotional And Cultural Intelligence And Diversity †Free Samples

Question: Discuss about the Emotional And Cultural Intelligence And Diversity. Answer: Introduction This essay discusses about the three assessments that has been taken by me and two other dear friend of mine. These tastes are on Howard Gardners Basic Multiple Intelligence Test, Daniel Golemans EQ Instrument and Johari Window Model test. In this essay I will give a critical analysis on the basis of the result of each of the tests taken by me and my friends and further compare my results with them with respect to these respective tests. I will also analyze with respect to the 4 quadrants of the Johari Test i.e. open, blind, hidden, and unknown. Further I will analyze my strength and weakness based on the survey that I have done on myself and discuss how I can improve myself, and lastly I will discuss about the capabilities of mine that I would like to develop as a global citizen and further it five practical references that presume works ethnically as a global citizen. In the Howard Gardners Basic Multiple Intelligence Test my range of naturalistic intelligence came highest and therefore it means I am extremely curious about people or any living thing and the planet, it is an intelligence that can be build up in childhood. These are the people who are curious in nature whereas my friend as mentioned as person 1 her naturalistic is very low which is 33%, which means she is not so attached t nature and again person 2 has got 75% in naturalist intelligence (Nickerson Zodhiates 2013). This difference of marks proves that the upbringing of the three people is completely different from the other as this intelligence takes place mostly during childhood. My lowest is logical-mathematical intelligence which means that I am not a very logical person in order of puzzle or solving problems, which also means according to Howard Gardners test that I do not enjoy experiment whereas person 1 and person 2s result is average in logical-mathematical. In Johar Window there are four (Algiraigri 2014) windows of self assessment which us open, blind, hidden and unknown. As per my result my hidden sides are bold, helpful, independent, loving and trustworthy, these are the ability which I have underestimated about myself because of less chance, support and confidence. I have to make sure they come out in various ways and I can put forward these feelings, in the result it also shows in the unknown part that I am brave, calm, cheerful, mature, logical, and confident and many more. These are the qualities I do not know about myself which is repressed or a subconscious feeling. (Saxena, 2015) In Johari Window it helps us to understand our strength and weakness, things that we know about ourselves and parts that other people knows about me. In the result Arena means open, Faade means hidden, and then there is blind and unknown (McKimm Swanwick 2013). This particular test is taken to have a better understand about our own selves. We often do not understa nd our own reaction because we do not communicate much. It is necessary to talk to other people and ask them their view point about us as well, people can serve as mirror sometimes ad therefore communication is necessary (Horney 2013). I have taken three tests, Howard Gardners Basic Multiple Intelligences Test, Daniel Golemans EQ test and Johari Window test. In Howard Gardners Basic Multiple Intelligences Test I have been marked on percentage. In naturalistic I have got 92% which means I am outdoorsy kind of a person. In linguistic I have got 58% which means that I am average with words and I can persuade and influence people with words, in logical-mathematical my percentage is low which means I am not a logical person as I got 31% in that. In Intrapersonal which means a person who is better at self-reflecting themselves, with self-governance, I got 69% there; therefore I am an independent person who likes to work alone. While person 1 has got 33% in linguistic and 33% in naturalistic which is different from mine, and person 2 has got 50% in linguistic and 75% in naturalistic which is still close to my percentage. ( Mishar Bangun 2014) In the Daniel Golemans EQ test the score was 100 which is average while person 1 and 2 got 30 and 65 respectively which is not so good. This shows my emotional intelligence which has be to be improved. Emotion Intelligence test is taken in context of individuality and strength and well being (Zeidner 2013). This test gave me situations that I have never faced or never thought about as such but the answers and the result showed me how adequately I can handle the situations. The side that I never knew existed. In this test they have given hypothetical situations which helped me understand how I would tackle that situation. In respect to all the tests my strength is the outdoor nature that I have, I am independent, cheerful, intelligent, knowledgeable and organized, I have a way with words which might help me in the future run anyhow there are many aspects in me which is unknown to me and which I am incapable to show others. In respect to these tests I have to improve and build my character in a better way. As discussed in the result of those tests I have to determine myself to start identifying myself. The result which I got from the three tests helped me understand better. In Howard Gardners Basic Multiple Intelligence test I understood that how I need to improve in analyzing things logically, to get a perspective of situations, even though I need to better myself in learning maps, plan things better, and learn to understand oral lessons well. In order to do that I have to understand and try to ask questions to look for clarifications. To sustain in this world a person has to be more aware of his or her quality and hence it is important to do self analysis and according improve one. For example to work in a company one has to be extremely logical and smart in order to tackle situations, but instead if I am nave and sensitive then it will be my loss. Asking questions is very important as it helps to cle ar a lot of confusion and therefore I have to be more curious and outspoken to clear my doubts. The major changes should be outwardly changes and then I have to deal with my inner problems, if needed take help from experts and even friends. Conclusion This is essay has got a very topic in which self analysis is done. In the mentioned three tests and by giving them it has helped me understand better about my qualities and it helped even more by comparing me with other friends. It is useful as with respect to this result I am aware of my positives and negatives, and helped me to analyze myself in order to fit in this world, and work as global citizen. It has helped me learn the different side that we all have and with Johari Window analysis, I came to know about my unknown and hidden sides. References Algiraigri, A.H., 2014. Ten tips for receiving feedback effectively in clinical practice.Medical education online,19(1), p.25141. Batool, B.F., 2013. Emotional intelligence and effective leadership.Journal of Business Studies Quarterly,4(3), p.84. Horney, K., 2013.Self-analysis(Vol. 18). Routledge. Kohut, H., 2013.The analysis of the self: A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders. University of Chicago Press. McKimm, J. and Swanwick, T., 2013. Assessing learning needs.Clinical Teaching Made Easy: A practical guide to teaching and learning in clinical settings, p.7. Mishar, R. and Bangun, Y.R., 2014. Create the EQ modelling instrument based on Goleman and Bar-on models and psychological defense mechanisms.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,115, pp.394-406. Nickerson, R.S. and Zodhiates, P.P. eds., 2013.Technology in education: Looking toward 2020. Routledge. Saxena, P., 2015. JOHARI WINDOW: An Effective Model for Improving Interpersonal Communication and Managerial Effectiveness.SIT Journal of Management,5(2), pp.134-146. Tirri, K., Nokelainen, P. and Komulainen, E., 2013. Multiple Intelligences: Can they be measured.Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling,55(4), pp.438-461. Zeidner, M., 2013. What we know about emotional intelligence.Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal,27(3).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.